Friday, 29 April 2016

Current Adverts cont.

Just something I found interesting from the FAQ is this list because it just has some key parts that I personally think really connect back to the the idea of the use of credibility from communication theory, so maybe a nice simple connection/ tie in their. 

https://www.nzta.govt.nz/safety/our-advertising/frequently-asked-questions/

The New Zealand approach uses a blueprint developed from the Victorian experience. What does this blueprint include?

The NZ Transport Agency blueprint sets an expectation of high recall and cut-through for viewing audiences. It prescribes a research-led strategy, from concept development to final production. It uses 'branding' to encourage drivers to buy-in to the road safety message, eg 'Slow down'. It expects to provide support to enforcement and for enforcement to play a key role in reducing road trauma.
Essentially, our blueprint specifies the tone and manner of the communication, which:
  • invites the target group's awareness, ownership and enforcement of the problem
  • presents realistic situations and people that the target audience can identify with
  • uses realistic treatment (nothing false, contrived, over-clever or arty)
  • is factual, using new 'news' to persuade people
  • focuses on the effects on the victims, and their families and communities
  • includes as much emotion as possible – moves people emotionally and rationally
  • is credible, convincing, not apologetic, personable, offers solutions
  • engages or triggers their anxieties/concerns
  • surprises people
  • ensures the message leaves people thinking 'this could happen to me/us'
  • ensures the message leaves people thinking 'I don't want this to happen to someone I know'
  • does not lecture, nor threaten with authority, nor play on statistics
  • places the message as coming from experts, victims and communities, rather than the NZ Police or the NZ Transport Agency.


Thursday, 28 April 2016

Current Adverts

Just looking at all these current models of different Road Safety Awareness Ads shows a strong reliance on family and friend connections, how it can effect not just yourself as a singular being but those around you and involved in your life. So in terms of the Perloff reading (communication theory) Its more reliant on the credibility side of things.

Speed

Numbers Campaign

https://www.nzta.govt.nz/safety/driving-safely/speed/speed-ads/numbers/



Mistakes Campaign

https://www.nzta.govt.nz/safety/driving-safely/speed/speed-ads/mistakes/



Drugs

Thoughts Campaign

https://www.nzta.govt.nz/safety/driving-safely/alcohol-and-drugs/drug-affected-driving-advertising/thoughts/



Fatigue

Dead on Their Feet Campaign




Vehicle Safety

X-ray Safety Glasses Campaign



Check Your Car Campaign



Drink Driving

Limits Campaign


Local Legends



Young Driver

When you're not there campaign




Driver Distraction

Mobile Phone Campaign



Share The Road

See The Person Campaign






From NZTA about Advertising/ analysis

Their Priorities

Where everything Advertising from NZTA is found






Saturday, 16 April 2016

Week 5

Went to the ethics workshop early in the week and I no longer think that I need to interview anyone (Tracey), all the information that she gathers and all the stats etc. that you can possibly want are all on NZTA and the Ministry of Transport websites.

For Class I showed this info:


How do drivers characteristics effect ideals around road safety?

In Januaury 2016, 32 people died on New Zealand roads. This is 9 more then the previous year in the same time period and 7 more than the average January road toll for the last 5 years. 

What I want to find out is how personal characteristics effect driver responsibilities and effectiveness, and if this ir influenced by the strong use of negative, fear-based appeals in road safety messages prevalent in New Zealand media. 

Awareness
Safety
Crisis

“Personality is relatively a stable human characteristic that is not easily malleable by road safety interventions” 
Azadeh, Zarrin and Hammid 2016

Beirness (1993) showed that personality variables such as hostilty/anger, impulsiveness and thrill-seeking explained more than 35% of the variance in risky driving and about 20% of the variance in accidents.” 
Azadeh, Zarrin and Hammid 2016

“Mood is considered an enduring, longer-lasting, diffused affective state that is not typically focused upon (or aware) of a specific cause (Dillard & Wilson, 1993; Jorgensen, 1998).” 
Lewis, Watson and White 2008

“At a practical level, in many countries including Australia and New Zealand, there is a strong reliance on the use of negative, fear-based appeals in road safety. However, the empirical evidence relating to the use of such messages has been mixed. Furthermore, there is some evidence suggesting that community expectations may be shaped by advertising practice such that there may be circulatory in public perceptions based on the frequency of use and perceived effectiveness. (see Lewis, Watson, White & Tay, 2007).” 
Lewis, Watson and White 2008 

and this was my feedback...